Am I Missing Something?
On December 5, 2012, Jack Shakely wrote
in the L.A. Times:
"In February 2003, 450
economists, including 10 of the 24 living Nobel laureates in
economics, made a public plea to President George W. Bush not to
enact the recent tax cuts passed by Congress. These tax cuts,
officially called the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act
of 2003 but forever known as the Bush-era tax cuts, would not do what
they promised, the economists argued. Instead, they said, the cuts
would "worsen the budget deficit, increase inequality, decrease
the ability of the U.S. government to fund essential services, while
failing to produce economic growth."
In the nearly 10 years that have
elapsed since that plea, the budget deficit has ballooned, the gap
between the wealthy and the middle class has expanded, and the
American economy has spiraled into the greatest decline since the
Depression. History has proved that the 450 economists were correct.
On Dec. 31, these same Bush-era tax cuts are set to expire. This,
we are told in hushed or hysterical tones, could push the American
economy off a "fiscal cliff.""
After reading these paragraphs I have
to ask myself: am I missing something here? Is there a hidden
meaning, a subtle sub-text, an encoded message that only the chosen
few, all Republicans, can successfully interpret?
I think not.
A tax policy that has failed so
egregiously deserves to die.
No comments:
Post a Comment